合作客戶/
拜耳公司 |
同濟(jì)大學(xué) |
聯(lián)合大學(xué) |
美國保潔 |
美國強(qiáng)生 |
瑞士羅氏 |
相關(guān)新聞Info
-
> 從哪些方面可以體現(xiàn)出酶特異性地結(jié)合某種物質(zhì)？
> 不同質(zhì)量濃度、pH、鹽度對三七根提取物水溶液表面張力的影響（三）
> 產(chǎn)低溫β-甘露聚糖酶的菌株O5提升低溫油藏壓裂液的破膠性能——結(jié)果與討論、結(jié)論
> 密封防拆射頻標(biāo)簽的安裝時(shí)，需要考慮表面張力嗎？
> 氣體富集、雜質(zhì)對固-液界面納米氣泡接觸角的影響——引言、實(shí)驗(yàn)儀器與試劑
> 硅基納米原位乳化減阻劑與原油的界面張力達(dá)到10-1mN/m數(shù)量級，提高原油采收率
> 什么叫熔體，表面張力對陶瓷熔體的作用機(jī)理
> 不同表面張力溫度系數(shù)對激光焊接熔池流場的影響
> 釕催化劑合成丁炔二醇醚三硅氧烷表面活性劑反應(yīng)條件及表面張力測定（二）
> 表面活性劑在除草劑噴霧助劑中應(yīng)用及主要增效機(jī)制
推薦新聞Info
-
> 高速運(yùn)動(dòng)的微小水滴撞擊深水液池產(chǎn)生的空腔運(yùn)動(dòng)及形成機(jī)理（二）
> 高速運(yùn)動(dòng)的微小水滴撞擊深水液池產(chǎn)生的空腔運(yùn)動(dòng)及形成機(jī)理（一）
> 玻璃窗上水滴的運(yùn)動(dòng)控制影響因素及模型構(gòu)建
> 勝利油田常規(guī)和親油性石油磺酸鹽組成、色譜、質(zhì)譜、界面張力測定（一）
> 三元復(fù)合體系的界面擴(kuò)張黏彈性對水驅(qū)后殘余油的乳化作用——結(jié)論
> 三元復(fù)合體系的界面擴(kuò)張黏彈性對水驅(qū)后殘余油的乳化作用——實(shí)驗(yàn)材料及條件
> 新工藝提升葉黃素和玉米黃素聯(lián)產(chǎn)的塔式萃取效率
> 界面張力γ、潤濕角θ與泥頁巖孔半徑r關(guān)系（二）
> 界面張力γ、潤濕角θ與泥頁巖孔半徑r關(guān)系（一）
> 不同溫度壓力下CO2和混合烷烴的界面張力測定（二）
表面活性劑是否對斥水性土壤的潤濕性有影響？——結(jié)論、致謝！
來源：上海謂載 瀏覽 1469 次 發(fā)布時(shí)間:2021-11-09
結(jié)論
不像人工創(chuàng)造的穩(wěn)定的驅(qū)蟲表面或多孔 介質(zhì)，拒水土壤表現(xiàn)出潤濕動(dòng)力學(xué)，由此 最初疏水的土壤隨著時(shí)間的推移變得親水 與水接觸時(shí)。 初始潤濕動(dòng)力學(xué) 排斥土壤通常歸因于 固液界面能 (γSL)，或液汽界面能 (γLV) 的降低，或兩者兼而有之。 γLV 的減少 建議是由于土壤表面溶解 活性有機(jī)化合物進(jìn)入與水接觸的水中 土壤。 在這項(xiàng)研究中，我們測試了土傳表面的影響 潤濕動(dòng)力學(xué)的活性物質(zhì)，并發(fā)現(xiàn)，與廣為接受的范式相反，土壤釋放表面 活性化合物不會(huì)加速潤濕過程。 因此很明顯，固體界面能的變化 表面（γSL 或 γSV），而不是液汽 表面 (γLV) 必須在驅(qū)動(dòng)不穩(wěn)定排斥性土壤的潤濕動(dòng)力學(xué)方面起主導(dǎo)作用。
致謝
本研究由以色列農(nóng)業(yè)部資助 和農(nóng)村發(fā)展，資助號 821-0088-04。
參考
Barrett, G. & Slaymaker, O. 1989. Identification, characterization, and hydrological implications of water repellency in mountain soils, southern British-Columbia. Catena, 16, 477–489.
Bisdom, E.B.A., Dekker, L.W. & Schoute, J.F.T. 1993. Water repellency of sieve fractions from sandy soils and relationships with organic material and soil structure. Geoderma, 56, 105–118.
Chen, Y. & Schnitzer, M. 1978. Surface-tension of aqueous-solutions of soil humic substances. Soil Science, 125, 7–15.
Dekker, L.W., Oostindie, K. & Ritsema, C.J. 2005. Exponential increase of publications related to soil water repellency. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 43, 403–441.
Dinar, E., Taraniuk, I., Graber, E.R., Katsman, S., Moise, T., Anttila, T. et al. 2006. Cloud condensation nuclei properties of model and atmospheric HULIS. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 6, 2465–2481.
Doerr, S.H., Shakesby, R.A. & Walsh, R.P.D. 2000. Soil water repellency: its causes, characteristics and hydro-geomorphological significance. Earth-Science Reviews, 51, 33–65.
Doerr, S.H., Dekker, L.W., Ritsema, C.J., Shakesby, R.A. & Bryant, R. 2002. Water repellency of soils: the influence of ambient relative humidity. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66, 401–405.
Ellerbrock, R.H., Gerke, H.H., Bachmann, J. & Goebel, M.O. 2005. Composition of organic matter fractions for explaining wettability of three forest soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 69, 57–66.
Feng, G.L., Letey, J. & Wu, L. 2002. The influence of two surfactants on infiltration into a water-repellent soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66, 361–367.
Gee, G.W. & Bauder, J.W. 1986. Particle-size analysis. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Monograph No 9 (ed. A. Klute), pp. 383–411.
American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI. Graber, E.R., Ben-Arie, O. & Wallach, R. 2006. Effect of sample disturbance on soil water repellency determination in sandy soils. Geoderma, 136, 11–19.
Hurrass, J. & Schaumann, G.E. 2006. Properties of soil organic matter and aqueous extracts of actually water repellent and wettable soil samples. Geoderma, 132, 222–239.
Letey, J. 1969. Measurement of contact angle, water drop penetration time, and critical surface tension. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Water Repellent Soils 6–8 May 1968 (eds L.F. DeBano & J.F. Letey), pp. 43–47. University of California, Riverside, CA. Letey, J., Carrillo, M.L.K. & Pang, X.P. 2000. Approaches to characterize the degree of water repellency. Journal of Hydrology, 231–232, 61–65.
Ma'shum, M. & Farmer, V.C. 1985. Origin and assessment of water repellency of a sandy South Australian soil. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 23, 623–626.
Roy, J.L. & McGill, W.B. 2002. Assessing soil water repellency using the molarity of ethanol droplet (MED) test. Soil Science, 167, 83–97.
Tschapek, M. 1984. Criteria for determining the hydrophilicityhydrophobicity of soils. Zeitschrift fu¨r Pflanzenerna¨hrung und Bodenkunde, 147, 137–149.
Walkley, A. & Black, I.A. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modifi- cation of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37, 29–38. Wallach, R. & Graber, E.R. 2007. Effluent irrigation-induced soil water repellency: time dependent variation of infiltration rate and of water repellency at different levels of ambient relative humidity. Hydrological Processes, 21, 2346–2355.
Wallach, R., Ben-Arie, O. & Graber, E.R. 2005. Soil water repellency induced by long-term irrigation with treated sewage effluent. Journal of Environmental Quality, 34, 1910–1920.
Wallis, M.G. & Horne, D.J. 1992. Soil water repellency. Advances in Soil Science, 20, 91–140.